ArticlePloS one2026
Barriers and facilitators to healthcare utilization amongst people living with sickle cell disease in the United States: A scoping review.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSickle cell disease (SCD) stands as one of the most prevalent genetic disorders in the United States (U.S.) that causes severe consequences such as organ damage and excruciating pain. Alarmingly, recent literature indicates a decline in the number of people living with SCD (PLWSCD) seeking professional care - hinting at an avoidance of the healthcare system. Therefore, this scoping review synthesizes the evidence regarding barriers and facilitators influencing healthcare utilization among PLWSCD within the U.S.
methodsTo map the current literature on SCD management and provide a comprehensive overview of the current knowledge gaps regarding healthcare utilization for PLWSCD, a scoping review was conducted. A systematic search of articles reporting on the utilization of healthcare among PLWSCD in the U.S using seven data sources was conducted on March 24, 2023, without any restrictions on publication date and language. To capture any additional articles, the search was updated on March 4, 2024. Two reviewers independently assessed studies for inclusion, data extraction, and risk of bias (RoB). MAIN
resultsA total of 708 articles were screened; 70 met the study criteria. Results indicated that the four most common barriers were social (n = 25) interpersonal (n = 23), economic (n = 15), and institutional level factors (n = 11). The top four most common facilitators were technology (n = 9), education (n = 7), autonomy (n = 6), and a positive patient-provider relationship (n = 6). The most common forms of healthcare utilization were inpatient or hospital admissions (n = 19) and emergency department (ED) visits (n = 18). Evidence-based interventions (EBI) found to decrease healthcare avoidance included individualized pain plans (IPPs) (n = 4) and quality improvement (QI) strategies (n = 3).
conclusionThis scoping review identified complex multilevel barriers that impede healthcare utilization, and facilitators likely to promote healthcare utilization among PLWSCD in the U.S. Future research should prioritize developing and evaluating comprehensive, multi-level interventions that address identified barriers while leveraging facilitators to improve healthcare engagement and outcomes for this vulnerable population. Healthcare systems and health policies must urgently adopt and integrate evidence-based strategies to rebuild trust and ensure equitable, accessible care for PLWSCD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.