ArticlePloS one2026
The load-velocity profiles and exercise-specific velocity zones for seven commonly used weightlifting exercises.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Velocity zones (e.g., 1.0-0.75 m·s-1) are commonly aligned with terminology such as "starting strength", 'speed-strength', 'strength-speed', 'accelerative strength', or 'absolute strength'. However, the load-velocity profiles of most exercises do not align with these discrete bands. The aims of this study were to 1) develop load-velocity profiles of seven weightlifting derivatives; and 2) create exercise-specific velocity zones that can be used to guide training prescription. Fourteen (6 males and 8 females) weightlifting athletes undertook six testing sessions that required maximal strength testing on occasions one and two, and the development of load-velocity profiles for the power snatch, hang power clean, snatch pull, hang clean pull, hang power snatch, clean pull, and hang snatch pull on testing occasions three to six. During each testing occasion, peak velocity was assessed. Linear mixed models with effect size ±95% confidence limits (CL) were used to detect changes across profiles and estimate exercise specific velocity zones. While all load-velocity profiles had a clear reduction in velocity as load was increased, each exercise was found to have substantially different velocity zones when compared to previous recommendations. Of note, all 'absolute strength' zones (i.e., > 80% one repetition maximum) from the weightlifting derivatives were found to be greater than 1.3 m·s-1 which is commonly used as the threshold for 'starting strength'. These findings demonstrate that, if these terms are to be used, exercise-specific load-velocity profiles should be developed. Furthermore, these findings provide practitioners with exercise-specific zones that can be used to enhance training prescription and target specific strength qualities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.