ArticlePLoS biology2026
Shared memories of event details in the human brain are altered by misinformation and test expectations.
Article in PLoS biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Shared memories of event details are crucial to eyewitness testimony. When different people encode or recall the same event, similar scene-specific neural activity patterns emerge across individual brains. However, it remains unclear whether these patterns are specific to event details and how test expectancy (i.e., expecting free recall or general memory tests) and misinformation affect them. In this study, 100 participants were randomly assigned to view one of two versions of each event. Both versions featured identical scenarios, but with different details. About half of the participants were informed about the upcoming free recall before viewing events, while the others were told to expect a general memory test. Functional magnetic resonance imaging was used to record their brain activity during four stages: viewing original events, initial free recall, reading misinformation, and final free recall of original events. The neuroimaging data were analyzed based on the similarity of neural patterns across participants. Test expectancy increased the similarity of detail-specific neural activity patterns between individuals when they viewed original events in brain regions relevant for visual attention. Misinformation increased the likelihood of people forming shared false memories of event details. People who formed shared false memories exhibited similar detail-specific patterns of activity in the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex when reading misinformation. People who formed shared true memories exhibited similar detail-specific patterns of activity in the inferior parietal lobe when viewing original events, as well as in the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and middle temporal gyrus when recalling them after exposure to misinformation. Our findings revealed that different brain regions of the default mode network play distinct roles in the encoding and recall of event details shared by individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.