Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42406765›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Semantic congruence impacts audiovisual processing in the Colavita effect.

Keira Dyck, Abigail Mitchell, Jonathan Wilbiks, Geneviève Desmarais

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Keira DyckDepartment of Psychology, Mount Allison University, Sackville, New Brunswick, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4143-0937
Abigail MitchellDepartment of Psychology, Mount Allison University, Sackville, New Brunswick, Canada.
Jonathan WilbiksDepartment of Psychology, University of New Brunswick Saint John, Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada.
Geneviève DesmaraisDepartment of Psychology, University of New Brunswick Saint John, Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2915-966X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Colavita effect is a phenomenon that occurs when participants are presented with auditory, visual, and audiovisual stimuli and are tasked to identify the modality of the stimuli. When audiovisual stimuli are presented, participants occasionally miss the auditory component and report that the stimulus was visual only - reflecting visual dominance. The Colavita effect has been shown to be resistant to manipulations of semantic correspondence, which is surprising considering that semantic information impacts multiple perceptual tasks. It is possible that the brief auditory stimuli used for Colavita tasks do not allow for recognition, preventing the recruitment of semantics. We first replicated the Colavita effect using words as stimuli. We then manipulated semantic correspondence by pairing the auditory (sounds or words) and visual (pictures) components of the stimuli either with the same concept (e.g., the picture of a cat with the sound of a cat or the word 'cat') or different concepts (e.g., the picture of a cat with the sound of a dog or the word 'dog'). In Experiment 2, we observed that semantic correspondence influenced the magnitude of the Colavita effect: when the visual and auditory component corresponded to different concepts, the size of the Colavita effect was reduced. Finally, in Experiment 3 we observed that using visual and auditory stimuli from different categories further reduced the effect. We suggest semantic congruence influences the unity of bimodal stimuli: congruent stimuli are more easily perceived as a single entity while incongruent stimuli are not as easily perceived as a single entity, leading to a reduction of 'visual-only' responses.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionSemanticsVisual PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAnimalsFemaleHumansMalePhotic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID42406765
PMCPMC13336217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.