ArticlePloS one2026
Assessment of cricket frass as a sustainable organic fertilizer: Effects on seedling establishment, growth and fruit yield of zucchini (Cucurbita pepo).
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inherently poor soil quality, compounded by widespread soil degradation from unsustainable farming practices, continues to constrain agricultural productivity in Madagascar. As a result, fertilizer application has become essential for improving crop yields. This study assessed the effects of cricket frass fertilizer (CFF) from Gryllus madagascariensis on zucchini (Cucurbita pepo) production, in comparison with cattle manure (CM) and NPK, across two contrasting sites in southeastern Madagascar: Tsaratanàna, a relatively nutrient-rich coastal site, and Namohora, a nutrient-poor inland site. Seven fertilizer treatments were evaluated: an unfertilized control, CM (3.75 g N/plant), NPK (3.75 g N/plant), CFF at the baseline dose (3.75 g N/plant), ¼ × CFF (0.94 g N/plant), 2 × CFF (7.50 g N/plant), and a CM + CFF combination (7.50 g N/plant total). Plant survival was highest with ¼ × CFF in Tsaratanàna and with 2 × CFF in Namohora. Plant height and leaf number generally increased with increasing CFF dose at both sites. Yield responses were site-dependent: NPK produced the highest yield in Tsaratanàna, whereas 2 × CFF produced the highest yield in Namohora. Overall, CFF improved zucchini survival, growth, and yield relative to the unfertilized control. CFF performance relative to cattle manure varied across sites but generally remained comparable or superior, whereas its performance relative to NPK was not consistently superior across sites. These findings indicate that CFF is a promising organic fertilizer for zucchini, particularly under nutrient-poor conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.