ArticleNeuro-degenerative diseases2026
Standardizing Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Diagnosis: The Interdisciplinary Lausanne's Protocol.
Article in Neuro-degenerative diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIdiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is a reversible neurological condition characterized by gait disorders, cognitive impairment, and urinary incontinence with ventriculomegaly at brain imaging. Due to the diagnostic complexity, we developed a structured multidisciplinary protocol to improve iNPH diagnosis. We present here the results of the first year after its implementation.
methodsA multidisciplinary team involving neurosurgeons, physical therapists, neuropsychologists, and neurologists at the Lausanne University Hospitals (Switzerland) organized a diagnostic path with the following steps: first neurological assessment at the Leenaards Memory Center, neuropsychological assessment, CSF tap test with physiotherapeutic evaluation before and 24 h after the CSF tap-test, post-CSF tap test interdisciplinary consultation with a neurosurgeon and a neurologist, and an interdisciplinary board. In case of neurosurgical treatment, interdisciplinary consultations took place at 6 weeks, 6 and 12 months.
resultsThis retrospective analysis included 86 patients (mean age: 76.26 ± 9.08 years; 32.6% female) evaluated between June 2024 and May 2025. Gait disorders were the most common complaint (94.2% of the patients) followed by cognitive (75.6%) and urinary (60.5%) complaints. After initial investigations, the Board evaluated 44 candidates and recommended ventriculoperitoneal shunting for 27 patients. So far, 16 patients have been operated. A total of 92% reported gait improvement at 6 weeks postoperative control. Patients above 80 years of age reported more often gait improvement than patients below 80 years.
conclusionThe Lausanne's protocol demonstrates a feasible, structured, simplified, and efficient diagnostic pathway for iNPH, especially for the oldest patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.