Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42406527›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in HIV and AIDS2026

Learned young: HIV-1 germline-targeting vaccination in infants.

Rogier W Sanders, Tom G Caniels, John P Moore, Sallie R Permar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in HIV and AIDS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rogier W SandersDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Tom G CanielsDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Amsterdam University Medical Center.
John P MooreDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Sallie R PermarDepartment of Pediatrics, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewIt is standard practice to protect infants against viruses that they are exposed to early in life, during childhood, or as adults. While HIV-1 is only rarely a risk in the period between the end of breast-feeding and the onset of sexual maturity, there are good immunological and practical arguments for assessing whether vaccination of young children might be beneficial. RECENT

findingsStudies of HIV-1-infected individuals suggest that the characteristics of the developing immune system may favor the evolution of B cells that produce broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs), when compared to the same processes in adults. One way to exploit these properties of the infant immune system is targeting the germline precursors of B cells that can, over time and with the right sequential antigenic stimuli, mature into bNAb-producing plasma cells. Multidose immunization over time is standard practice within global childhood vaccine frameworks. SUMMARY: We discuss strategies to accomplish the goal of inducing bNAbs, based on the use of specifically designed envelope glycoprotein immunogens. We also summarize how bNAbs may be used for passive protection of infants and combined with active vaccination.

Indexed as

AIDS VaccinesHIV-1HIV AntibodiesHIV InfectionsAntibodies, NeutralizingB-LymphocytesHumansInfantVaccinationAIDS VaccinesAntibodies, NeutralizingHIV Antibodiesbroadly neutralizing antibodiesgermline-targeting vaccineHIV-1pediatric vaccine

Identifiers

PMID42406527
PMCPMC13566371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.