Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42406521›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2026

More Converged, Less Accurate? Reassessing Standard Choices for Ab Initio Water Using Machine Learning Potentials.

Hubert Beck, Ondrej Marsalek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hubert BeckCharles University, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Ke Karlovu 3, 121 16 Prague 2, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-7191-2192
Ondrej MarsalekCharles University, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Ke Karlovu 3, 121 16 Prague 2, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-8624-8837

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurately simulating the properties of liquid water remains a central challenge in molecular simulations. In this work, we use machine learning potentials to investigate how the convergence settings of electronic structure calculations impact the predicted structural and dynamical properties of simulated water and ice. We evaluate the true performance of several reference methods in classical and path-integral molecular dynamics. When we compare a popular, computationally pragmatic revPBE0-D3 setup against a highly converged one, our results reveal that its widely reported experimental agreement degrades. Applying the same highly converged settings to the ωB97X-rV functional, we find an improved agreement with experimental results. MP2 with a triple-ζ basis set, commonly used for liquid water, shows poor performance, which is indicative of insufficient convergence. These findings underscore the need for fully converged reference calculations when evaluating the fundamental accuracy of electronic structure methods and developing reliable models for aqueous systems.

Identifiers

PMID42406521
PMCPMC13383747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.