Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42406427›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2026

Reassessing the Proposed Creatine-PrP Axis in Endometriosis: Methodological and Mechanistic Considerations.

Marco Machado

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Marco MachadoFundação Universitária de Itaperuna, Itaperuna, RJ, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6364-6798

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The research by Chen et al. (2024) presents an innovative hypothesis linking creatine metabolism to ferroptosis resistance in endometriotic stromal cells via PrP suppression. While conceptually valuable, methodological aspects warrant reflection. A primary concern involves the supraphysiological creatine concentrations used, whose translational relevance is questionable without pharmacokinetic data confirming these levels in the peritoneal environment, particularly in light of available clinical metabolomics data suggesting differences in creatine levels in peritoneal fluid under physiological and pathological conditions. Furthermore, the proposed direct suppression of PrP ferrireductase activity would benefit from complementary biochemical validation using purified systems and affinity measurements to consolidate the molecular mechanism. Although human samples were included, the small cohort size and lack of control for confounding variables limit the specificity of interpretation, source attribution, and the external generalizability of the findings. Finally, future studies should target endogenous creatine synthesis or transport to clarify whether creatine is a causal driver of ferroptosis resistance or simply associated with the inflammatory microenvironment. Overall, Chen et al. provide an exciting contribution; these constructive considerations aim to support future refinements that will solidify the proposed model and its clinical significance.

Indexed as

CreatineEndometriosisFemaleFerroptosisHumansCreatinecreatine metabolismendometriosisferroptosis resistancemetabolic regulationprion protein

Identifiers

PMID42406427
PMCPMC13335757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.