Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42406402›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2026

Prefrontal Transcranial Pulse Stimulation for Major Depressive Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Penny Ping Qin, Minxia Jin, Rebecca Laidi Kan, Ivan Chak, Bella Bingbing Zhang, Wanda Chau, Ami Li, Tim Tianze Lin, Adam Weili Xia, Sharie Xiao Wang and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05551585 (A Randomized, Double-blind, Sham-controlled Clinical Trial of Transcranial Pulse Stimulation for the Treatment of Major Depression), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05551585 nacompletednot on this map

A Randomized, Double-blind, Sham-controlled Clinical Trial of Transcranial Pulse Stimulation for the Treatment of Major Depression

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityRan2023 to 2025Enrolled80ConditionsMajor DepressionArmsTranscranial pulse stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Penny Ping QinDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Minxia JinDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Rebecca Laidi KanDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Ivan ChakDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Bella Bingbing ZhangDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Wanda ChauDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Ami LiDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Tim Tianze LinDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Adam Weili XiaDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Sharie Xiao WangDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Tifei YuanShanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai, China.
Teris CheungSchool of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Roland BeisteinerDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Lei SunDepartment of Biomedical Engineering , The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Frank PadbergDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich, Munich, Germany.
Georg S KranzDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Transcranial pulse stimulation is a novel noninvasive brain stimulation technique with preliminary evidence of antidepressant effects; however, its efficacy has not been tested in a double-blind, sham-controlled randomized clinical trial. Objective: To examine the antidepressant efficacy of transcranial pulse stimulation for major depressive disorder. Design, Setting, and Participants: This 2-arm, parallel-design, double-blind, sham-controlled randomized clinical trial was conducted between June 1, 2023, and October 31, 2025, at the Hong Kong Polytechnic University. Patients with major depressive disorder and a Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score of 14 or higher were convenience sampled and enrolled. Interventions: Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive 12 sessions (1000 pulses per session) of active or sham transcranial pulse stimulation targeting the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during 4 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: Change in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale score (range, 0 [no depression] to 60 [severe depression], with a change of at least 6 indicating minimal change and 12 or more indicating substantial change) after 12 treatment sessions. Results: This modified intention-to-treat analysis included 80 participants (mean [SD] age, 35.6 [11.7] years; mean [SD] years of education, 15.5 [3.3]; 53 females), with 74 completing treatment and 6 withdrawing (2 from sham due to adverse effects); 40 participants were randomized to the active group and 40 to the sham group. The active group demonstrated a statistically significantly greater reduction in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale scores than the sham group (mean difference, -4.19; 95% CI, -8.33 to -0.04; P = .048; Hedges g = 0.45). Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging analyses found that, compared with the sham stimulation, active stimulation significantly enhanced functional connectivity within the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (mean difference, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.03-0.19; P = .009); between the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and left orbitofrontal, superior medial prefrontal, and pregenual anterior cingulate cortices (mean difference, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.05-0.17; P < .001); and between the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and posterior cingulate cortex and bilateral precuneus and calcarine cortex (mean difference, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.01-0.16; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial of transcranial pulse stimulation, the treatment was safe, well tolerated, and associated with antidepressant effects and modulation of multiple depression-relevant brain circuits. These findings provide a rationale for future studies to optimize therapeutic efficacy by increasing the number of treatment sessions and refining targeting strategies. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05551585.

Indexed as

Dorsolateral Prefrontal CortexMajor Depressive DisorderPrefrontal CortexUltrasonic TherapyAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHong KongHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID42406402
PMCPMC13338816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.