ArticleInfectious diseases and therapy2026
Safety Profiles of Seasonal Influenza Vaccines in Chinese Children and Adolescents: A Pooled Analysis of Five Clinical Studies.
Article in Infectious diseases and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionSafety concerns remain an important barrier to pediatric influenza vaccination, yet directly comparable evidence across vaccine platforms, valency formulations, and administration routes remains limited. This study compared the safety profiles of five seasonal influenza vaccines in Chinese children and adolescents.
methodsWe pooled individual-level safety data from five clinical studies including participants aged 6-17 years. Adverse event (AE) incidences and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using Clopper-Pearson methods, and multivariable logistic regression models were used to compare AE risks.
resultsAmong 2885 participants, overall AE incidence was 23.1% (95% CI, 21.6-24.7%). Grade 3 AEs were uncommon (≤ 1.1%), and no serious AEs were reported. AE profiles differed across vaccine platforms: inactivated vaccines were mainly associated with pyrexia and injection-site reactions, whereas trivalent live attenuated influenza vaccine was characterized by rhinorrhea, cough, and nasal congestion. Compared with trivalent inactivated split-virion vaccine, quadrivalent inactivated subunit vaccine was associated with lower odds of any AE (aOR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.35-0.79) and local AEs (aOR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.17-0.52).
conclusionsAll five vaccines showed acceptable short-term safety, with platform-specific reactogenicity patterns. Among inactivated vaccines, the quadrivalent subunit formulation showed a relative local tolerability advantage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.