ArticleApplied psychophysiology and biofeedback2026
The Impact of Self-Managed Virtual Reality Relaxation on Non-invasive Ambulatory Physiological Markers in Home-Based Psychiatric Care.
Article in Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05440825 (Self-management of Stress and Sleep Disturbances with Virtual Reality Relaxation for People with Burn-out, Mood, Anxiety or Psychotic Disorders), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Self-management of Stress and Sleep Disturbances with Virtual Reality Relaxation for People with Burn-out, Mood, Anxiety or Psychotic Disorders: a Single-blind Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Virtual reality (VR)-based relaxation interventions show promising effects, yet evidence on how self-guided interventions influence real-world physiological and subjective responses among psychiatric patients remains limited. Given the exploratory and preliminary nature of this study, we examined acute and longer-term autonomic and subjective responses to self-guided VR versus audio-guided relaxation, both during at-home relaxation sessions and across daily life (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05440825). In a single-blind randomized controlled trial, 53 outpatients with burnout or DSM-5 psychiatric diagnoses were assigned to VR (VRelax: n = 24) or audio-guided relaxation (n = 29). Participants engaged in their assigned method at least five times weekly for six weeks while wearing an Empatica E4 during weeks 1 and 6. Heart rate (HR), electrodermal activity (EDA), heart rate variability (HRV), movement, and subjective relaxation were assessed. Both interventions produced acute reductions in HR and phasic EDA during sessions, with comparable effects across modalities and partial attenuation over time. Physiological changes did not systematically predict subjective changes, aligning with evidence that psychological experience and autonomic responses often diverge in everyday contexts. Movement was positively associated with HR and EDA, reflecting activity-related variation. Tonic HR and EDA indices showed trait-like stability, whereas phasic EDA demonstrated state-like variability. This is the first study characterizing real-world autonomic and subjective responses to both modalities among psychiatric patients. Findings indicate that both modalities downregulate autonomic arousal in everyday settings, supporting momentary relaxation without altering trait-like physiology. Results highlight the feasibility and clinical potential of integrating personalized, ambulatory relaxation interventions into routine outpatient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42406301What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.