ArticleMolecular diversity2026
Tetrapeptide inhibitors of BACE-1 revealed by combined data-driven screening and physics-based free-energy refinement.
Article in Molecular diversity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease remains a major global health challenge, and β-site amyloid precursor protein cleaving enzyme 1 (BACE-1) represents a critical therapeutic target as it catalyzes the rate-limiting step in amyloid-β production. While computational studies have extensively explored small-molecule BACE-1 inhibitors, large-scale screening combined with physics-based refinement has rarely been applied to peptide scaffolds. Here, we report an integrated machine learning (ML)-to- free energy perturbation (FEP) pipeline, combining XGBoost-based screening, molecular docking, replicate explicit-solvent molecular dynamics (MD), and absolute FEP calculations, as a multi-stage alternative to single-scoring approaches for tetrapeptide lead discovery against BACE-1. Screening a library of 16,000 tetrapeptides with an XGBoost model prioritized four candidates (HWRE, HWER, WHRR, and HWRQ) for structure-based evaluation. Molecular docking confirmed favorable positioning within the catalytic cleft, while replicate MD simulations revealed multivalent binding through hydrogen bonds, salt bridges to the catalytic dyad (Asp32/Asp228), and hydrophobic contacts with conserved pocket residues; interaction-fingerprint and hotspot analyses provided residue-level guidance for optimization. FEP calculations delivered quantitative thermodynamic ranking, separating three strong predicted binders (HWRE, WHRR, HWRQ; ΔG
Indexed as
Identifiers
42406259What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.