ArticleBrain informatics2026
Generalizable and explainable deep learning for brain MRI: a multi-cohort evaluation of 3D architectures for age and sex prediction.
Article in Brain informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep learning (DL) methods increasingly outperform classical approaches in brain MRI analysis, yet their generalizability across independent imaging cohorts remains insufficiently evaluated. Because age and sex are fundamental neurobiological factors influencing brain structure and disease risk, this study systematically compares three three-dimensional architectures-Simple Fully Convolutional Network (SFCN), DenseNet121, and Swin Transformer-for age and sex prediction using T1-weighted MRI from four independent cohorts: UK Biobank (UKB, n = 47,390), Dallas Lifespan Brain Study (DLBS, n = 132), Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI, n = 108 controls), and Information eXtraction from Images (IXI, n = 319). SFCN consistently demonstrated the most robust performance. For sex classification, it achieved an AUC of 1.00 [1.00-1.00] in the UKB internal test set and 0.85-0.91 across external cohorts. For age prediction, SFCN achieved a mean absolute error (MAE) of 2.66 years (r = 0.89) internally and 4.98-5.81 years (r = 0.55-0.70) externally. Pairwise DeLong and Wilcoxon tests with Bonferroni correction confirmed significantly better performance of SFCN compared with Swin Transformer in most cohorts (p < 0.017). No significant demographic subgroup biases were observed. Explainability analyses further showed task-specific and spatially consistent attention patterns across cohorts. These findings demonstrate that simpler convolutional architectures can generalize more reliably than more complex attention-based models in multi-cohort settings. The study highlights the importance of external validation and emphasizes potential trade-offs between model complexity, robustness, and interpretability for clinically relevant neuroimaging applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.