ReviewJournal of immigrant and minority health2026
Experiences and Perceptions of Mental Health Interventions, Services, and Programs among Women Living with Varying Immigration Statuses in Canada: A Qualitative Systematic Review.
Review in Journal of immigrant and minority health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Health, immigration status, race, and gender are intersecting concepts that reveal higher rates of acute and chronic mental health concerns among women. This qualitative systematic review aimed to identify, critically appraise, and synthesize qualitative evidence on how women living with diverse immigration statuses experience mental health interventions in Canada. Literature was searched using Medline (Ovid) and then translated into each of the following databases: Cumulative Index for Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL Ebsco), PsycINFO (Ebsco), Web of Science, CINAHL, Medline and PsycINFO; and Web of Science. Using Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methods and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, studies published between 2003 and 2025 were identified and screened within Covidence for quality using the standard JBI critical appraisal checklist for qualitative research. A total of 107 findings consisting of participants' verbatim quotes were extracted from 18 studies and aggregated into the following synthesized findings: (1) Women's socio-emotional well-being, (2) Culturally misaligned mental health care among racialized women, (3) Women's cultural preferences and access conditions, and (4) Women's recommendations for improving mental health care and support. Implications of the review findings address gaps in equity-informed mental health services tailored to women living at the intersections of racism and diverse immigration status in Canada.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42406204What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.