ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2026
Feasibility evaluation of tumor treating fields for brainstem gliomas.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTumor treating fields (TTFields) are FDA-approved for supratentorial glioblastoma, but feasibility in infratentorial tumors remains poorly defined. This simulation study evaluated TTFields dose in brainstem gliomas using patient-specific modeling with scalp-only transducer arrays.
methodsMRI and CT imaging from seven patients with brainstem gliomas were used for TTFields planning with MAXPOINT
resultsMAXPOINT-optimized layouts achieved significantly higher LMiFI than the standard layout across all regions (all p ≤ 0.019). GTV median LMiFI was 1.1 vs. 1.0 V/cm (p = 0.019). CTV median LMiFI was 1.1 vs. 1.0 V/cm (p = 0.002). Brainstem median LMiFI was 1.3 vs. 1.1 V/cm (p = 0.002). Posterior fossa showed the largest difference: median LMiFI 1.5 vs. 1.2 V/cm (p < 0.001). All optimized LMiFI values met or exceeded the therapeutic reference. LMiPD was also significantly higher with MAXPOINT
conclusionThis simulation study demonstrates that patient-specific modeling can achieve favorable TTFields intensities in brainstem gliomas using scalp-only arrays, supporting prospective clinical evaluation for infratentorial tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.