ArticleExperimental brain research2026
Effects of tDCS and tACS on operant tactile training: investigating individual differences in neuromodulation efficacy.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tactile perceptual learning-the improvement of tactile discrimination abilities through experience or training-is fundamental to sensory rehabilitation and skill acquisition. Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques have emerged as promising tools to modulate somatosensory cortical excitability and plasticity, thereby enhancing tactile perceptual learning. Here we present two experiments in which we further examined the effectiveness of transcranial direct and alternating current stimulation on tactile operant learning in a grating orientation discrimination task (GOT). While in experiment 1 we compared the online and offline training effects of tDCS to sham stimulation and tDCS effects without training, in experiment 2, we contrasted the effects of tDCS and tACS on tactile training and examined whether training effects could be predicted by baseline oscillatory brain activity as measured with electroencephalography. In both experiments, participants improved their discrimination performance during training independent of group (experiment 1) or condition (experiment 2), even when controlling for pre-test thresholds. Offline effects of training were inconsistent between experiments. Irrespective of stimulation conditions (tDCS, tACS, sham), training effects could be predicted by baseline brain oscillatory patterns. Higher frontal theta-beta power ratio predicted stronger online training effects, particularly in the tDCS condition. Offline effects of tDCS and tACS combined with tactile training could be predicted by centro-parietal alpha power at pre-test. Interestingly, in experiment 2, participants revealed lower GOT thresholds during training in the tDCS than in the tACS condition. One might speculate that tACS interferes with task-related alpha desynchronization during training. This option requires further testing in future experiments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42406118What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.