ArticleNeuroradiology2026
Anterior cerebral artery variants and their influence on endovascular outcomes: a propensity score matched analysis from the CRETA registry.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
50 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnatomical variants of the anterior cerebral artery (ACA) may increase technical complexity during endovascular treatment of distal ACA aneurysms (DACA). However, their impact on treatment outcomes remains unclear. This study evaluated whether ACA variants influence angiographic and clinical outcomes following endovascular treatment.
methodsA retrospective multicenter analysis was conducted using data from the CRETA Registry, including patients with ruptured and unruptured DACA treated endovascularly. Patients were grouped according to ACA anatomy (variant vs. conventional). Outcomes were compared after propensity score matching (PSM) to adjust for confounders including age, aneurysm rupture status, dome-to-neck ratio, branch origin, and treatment type. The primary outcome was aneurysm occlusion at last follow-up based on the Raymond-Roy classification. Secondary outcomes included ischemic and hemorrhagic complications, vasospasm, and clinical outcome measured by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS).
resultsAfter PSM, 128 patients were included (64 per group). Among patients with available imaging follow-up (54 in the conventional group and 55 in the variant group), adequate occlusion rates were comparable between the variant and conventional ACA groups (81.5% vs. 85.5%; p = 0.600). No significant differences were observed in ischemic or hemorrhagic complications, vasospasm, or long-term clinical outcomes. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the findings.
conclusionsACA anatomical variants do not adversely affect the safety or efficacy of endovascular treatment for DACA. With appropriate anatomical assessment and treatment selection, endovascular therapy remains effective even in the presence of complex ACA configurations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42406028What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.