Observational studyEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2026
Hybrid versus single internal fixation strategies in minimally invasive surgery for multiple rib fractures: a retrospective comparative analysis.
Observational study in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSurgical stabilization of rib fractures typically employs a single type of internal fixation material. While this "Single Strategy" offers the advantage of procedural consistency and facilitates a rapid learning curve for surgeons, it often fails to address the heterogeneity of multiple rib fractures (MRF). Factors such as fracture location, segment length, degree of comminution, and associated intrathoracic visceral injuries frequently render a single material insufficient for all fracture types within a single patient. Consequently, we adopted a clinical approach utilizing multiple fixation materials tailored to specific fracture characteristics. To date, systematic implementation of such a "Hybrid Fixation Strategy" has not been widely reported. This study aims to evaluate the safety and feasibility of this multi-material approach in patients with MRF.
methodsA retrospective, controlled, observational study was conducted on patients with MRF and flail chest treated between 2020 and 2024. A total of 316 patients were included and stratified into two groups. The Hybrid Group (n = 128) consisted of consecutive patients treated with a combination of at least two types of internal fixation materials (specifically locking plates and rib clamps) based on anatomical requirements. The Single Group (n = 188) was treated using a single fixation material. Perioperative efficiency, safety profiles, and clinical outcomes were compared to assess feasibility.
resultsThe Hybrid Group demonstrated superior feasibility and efficiency, with significantly shorter operative times (94.72 ± 15.46 vs. 147.53 ± 31.04 min, P < 0.001) and reduced intraoperative blood loss (213.40 ± 83.19 vs. 298.60 ± 115.96 mL, P < 0.001) compared to the Single Group. Regarding safety, there was no significant difference in the overall incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups (P > 0.05). Additionally, patients in the Hybrid Group achieved earlier ambulation (1.16 ± 0.39 vs. 2.44 ± 1.13 days, P < 0.001), indicating enhanced postoperative recovery.
conclusionThe application of multiple internal fixation materials (Hybrid Strategy) is a safe and feasible technique for managing complex MRF. By addressing the limitations of single-material fixation through site-specific adaptation, this strategy improves surgical efficiency and stability without compromising safety. While these results are promising, further studies with larger sample sizes are warranted to validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42405978What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.