ArticlePsychological research2026
Does sport expertise bridge the sex gap in mental rotation? Bayesian evidence for the critical role of visuospatial demands.
Article in Psychological research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The sex gap in spatial cognition, particularly in mental rotation (MR) represents a robust individual difference with significant implications for achievement in STEM fields. While some research suggests that sport expertise may reduce this gap, it remains unclear whether such attenuation is a general consequence of athletic expertise or if it depends on the specific visuospatial demands of the discipline. A sample of 180 young adults was categorized into three groups: Wrestlers (dynamic/3D expertise), Track and Field athletes (linear expertise), and Non-Athletes. Participants performed a chronometric MR task with angular disparities ranging from 0° to 150°. Data were analyzed using Bayesian linear and generalized mixed-effects models to account for inter-individual heterogeneity. Results revealed that the mitigation of the sex gap is strictly discipline-specific. In both the Non-Athlete and Track and Field groups, a credible sex difference was observed, with males outperforming females by 12.0% and 14.5% in reaction time, respectively. In contrast, this gap was rendered negligible (3.6% difference) in the Wrestler group. Furthermore, analysis of accuracy slopes indicated that non-expert males prioritized speed at the expense of precision as task difficulty increased, whereas Wrestlers exhibited a stabilized, high-accuracy performance profile across both sexes. These findings suggest that high-demand visuospatial training, such as wrestling, is associated with a powerful equalizing effect on spatial proficiency, highlighting the potential role of functional congruence in cognitive transfer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42405969What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.