Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42405797›Full record

ArticlemBio2026

Limited codiversification of the gut microbiota within humans.

Benjamin H Good

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mBio, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Benjamin H GoodDepartment of Applied Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7757-3347

Funding

Quantitative approaches for mapping the real-time evolution of the gut microbiotaR35GM146949 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Benjamin H Good · 2022 to 2026
$2.0M
Alfred P. Sloan Foundation FG-2021-15708Biohub - San Francisco Investigator AwardNIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM146949NIH HHS R35GM146949
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gut bacteria exhibit striking variation across different human populations, but the evolutionary forces that have shaped this diversity are less well understood. Recent work has argued that many species of gut bacteria have codiversified with modern humans, based on the phylogenetic correlations between human and microbial genomes. Here, I re-analyze these data and show that the correlations between human and microbial phylogenies are often substantially weaker than those between unlinked human chromosomes and that similar correlations can arise through geographic structure alone. These results suggest that traditional codiversification has been limited in recent human history and highlight alternative strategies for quantifying the extent of human-microbe coevolution. IMPORTANCE: There is widespread interest in understanding the evolutionary history of our gut microbiota and how it varies within and among different human population groups. This Observation critically re-examines the hypothesis that many commensal gut bacteria have evolved in parallel (or "codiversified") with modern humans, providing new evidence that the correlations between human and microbial genealogies are weaker than previously supposed. These findings have important evolutionary implications and also practical consequences, from the sourcing of probiotic therapies to the design of sequencing-based diagnostics.

Indexed as

BacteriaGastrointestinal MicrobiomeGastrointestinal TractEvolution, MolecularGenetic VariationHumansPhylogenyhuman gut microbiomephylogeographypopulation genetics

Identifiers

PMID42405797
PMCPMC13463816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.