ArticlemBio2026
Limited codiversification of the gut microbiota within humans.
Article in mBio, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Partner fidelity, not geography, drives co-diversification of gut microbiota with hominids.Biology letters · 2025Pooled it
- Dynamics of bacterial recombination in the human gut microbiome.PLoS biology · 2024Article
- Assessing co-diversification in host-associated microbiomes.Journal of evolutionary biology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Gut bacteria exhibit striking variation across different human populations, but the evolutionary forces that have shaped this diversity are less well understood. Recent work has argued that many species of gut bacteria have codiversified with modern humans, based on the phylogenetic correlations between human and microbial genomes. Here, I re-analyze these data and show that the correlations between human and microbial phylogenies are often substantially weaker than those between unlinked human chromosomes and that similar correlations can arise through geographic structure alone. These results suggest that traditional codiversification has been limited in recent human history and highlight alternative strategies for quantifying the extent of human-microbe coevolution. IMPORTANCE: There is widespread interest in understanding the evolutionary history of our gut microbiota and how it varies within and among different human population groups. This Observation critically re-examines the hypothesis that many commensal gut bacteria have evolved in parallel (or "codiversified") with modern humans, providing new evidence that the correlations between human and microbial genealogies are weaker than previously supposed. These findings have important evolutionary implications and also practical consequences, from the sourcing of probiotic therapies to the design of sequencing-based diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.