ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2026
Intraspecific diversity of
Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Long-term associations within an individual host allow bacterial populations to diversify over time, sometimes resulting in the coexistence of multiple species or variants of the same species. Traditional methods for identifying infective agents generally involve isolating a single pathogen and potentially even a single colony from a given sample. While screening samples for virulent or difficult-to-treat pathogens is an important part of informing clinical treatment and correlative research, these reductive methods alone do not provide researchers or healthcare providers with the potentially important perspective on the true pathogen population. In this study, we begin to address this limitation by comparing the phenotypic and genotypic diversity of single colonies and pooled isolates of IMPORTANCE: When obtaining bacterial isolates from infections, it is important to consider the ecological biases introduced by methods used for collection and processing. In this study, we demonstrate how reductive sampling and processing methods traditionally used by clinical microbiology labs often do not adequately capture complex and clinically relevant traits present in diverse pathogen populations. When treating or studying bacteria like
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.