ArticlemBio2026
Dirty mice better recapitulate key features of mRNA vaccine immunogenicity observed in humans.
Article in mBio, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although specific-pathogen-free (SPF) mice have traditionally been used to test candidate vaccines, recent work has demonstrated that "dirty" mice with broad microbial exposure more appropriately recapitulate human immune responses. Using a dirty mouse model in which lab mice are co-housed with pet store mice, we modeled SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine responses in dirty and SPF mice. In this study, dirty mice showed reduced serum spike-binding antibody titers after prime vaccination and required a second booster dose to reach SPF-level spike antibody titers. Additionally, spike antibody titers waned faster in dirty mice in the 5 months following prime vaccination, while the neutralizing activity of these antibodies was reduced against Omicron variants, an effect that has also been observed in vaccinated humans. We further investigated the seasonality and consistency of pathogens in co-housed dirty mice, as well as the impact of serial microbial exposure on our animal model system. We found that pathogen exposure and T cell activation remained consistent over time and that a single co-housing event was sufficient to provide broad microbial exposure. This work demonstrates that the dirty mouse co-housing system is a promising, translationally representative approach to screen candidate mRNA vaccines for efficacy and durability prior to human clinical trials. IMPORTANCE: The development of mRNA vaccines during the COVID-19 pandemic dramatically reduced hospitalization and death rates for infected individuals. However, booster vaccinations were required to achieve high antibody titers, and protection waned over time. Our research leveraged a "dirty" mouse model to test whether SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccinations in animals with previous microbial exposure better modeled human immune responses. We found that, unlike standard SPF mice, dirty mice also require a booster vaccination to reach maximum antibody titers and experience waning serum antibody titers over time. We propose this platform as a future model for robust preclinical mRNA vaccine testing to improve immunogenicity and durability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.