ArticleJournal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.]2026
Accuracy of Three Different Strategies for Virtual Interocclusal Registration: An In Vitro Study.
Article in Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.], 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Record Extent and Occlusal Support in Scan-Assisted Interocclusal Registration: A Three-Dimensional In Vitro Study.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of three different strategies for virtual interocclusal registration in a fully dentate in vitro model. MATERIALS AND
methodsThree strategies for virtual interocclusal registration were compared: bilateral buccal registration, unilateral buccal registration, and anterior registration. For this purpose, two fully dentate resin models articulated using average-value settings were digitized 15 times per strategy using three different intraoral scanners. Accuracy was evaluated by superimposition of the intraoral scans with a virtual reference file generated using an industrial high-precision scanner.
resultsRegardless of the intraoral scanner used, bilateral buccal registration demonstrated significantly higher accuracy in terms of mean deviation across the entire dental arch compared with the other two strategies. No consistent trend was observed between unilateral buccal and anterior registration. For both unilateral buccal and anterior registration, a decrease in precision was observed with increasing distance from the registration site.
conclusionsIn fully dentate patients, bilateral buccal registration provides the highest accuracy for maxillomandibular alignment. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: A precise determination of the maxillomandibular relationship is essential in restorative and esthetic dentistry to ensure accurate model analysis, treatment planning, and fabrication of restorations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.