ArticleEuropean journal of neurology2026
Diagnostic Value of Neurofilament Light Chain and Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein in Differentiating Primary From Serious Secondary Headache.
Article in European journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHeadache is one of the most frequent reasons for emergency department (ED) visits, and distinguishing primary from secondary headache remains challenging. Blood biomarkers may improve early risk stratification. This study evaluates serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (sGFAP) as potential biomarkers in patients presenting with non-traumatic headache to the ED.
methodsSecondary analysis of a prospective multicenter case-control study at University Hospital Basel and Aarau, Switzerland. Patients presenting with acute non-traumatic headache were included. Final headache diagnoses were adjudicated by two board-certified neurologists. Blood samples obtained at ED presentation were analyzed for sNfL and sGFAP, excluding patients with conditions known to affect biomarker levels. Primary headache samples were matched to serious secondary headache samples. Biomarker levels were expressed as age-, BMI-, and sex-adjusted Z-scores.
resultsA total of 82 patients were analyzed (42 serious secondary, 40 primary headache). Median[IQR] sNfL Z-scores were significantly higher in serious secondary compared with primary headache (0.8 [0.0-1.8] vs. 0.2 [-0.3-0.8]; p < 0.01). sGFAP Z-scores showed an even greater difference (1.2 [-0.1-2.3] vs. -0.2 [-0.7-0.2]; p < 0.001). Both biomarkers demonstrated a specificity of 85%, but sGFAP showed higher sensitivity (57% vs. 43%), NPV (65% vs. 59%), and PPV (80% vs. 75%). In multivariable analysis adjusted for clinical risk factors, sGFAP remained independently associated with serious secondary headache (OR 1.9, 95%-CI 1.2-3.4), whereas sNfL did not. DISCUSSION: sGFAP may represent a promising biomarker to support differentiation between primary and non-traumatic serious secondary headache in the ED, warranting validation in larger cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.