Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42405655›Full record

ReviewPublic health nursing (Boston, Mass.)

Experiences of Women Who Do Not Participate in Breast Cancer Screening Programs: A Qualitative Study.

Nihal Karsli Durmaz, Nuran Gençtürk

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Public health nursing (Boston, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nihal Karsli DurmazFaculty of Health Sciences, Department of Midwifery, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Kırşehir, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1132-7418
Nuran GençtürkFaculty of Health Sciences, Department of Midwifery, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9906-4888

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThis study aimed to identify factors that prevent women from participating in breast cancer screening programs.

methodThis study was conducted using a phenomenological design within the qualitative research tradition. The sample consisted of 20 women who visited the XXXX Family Health Center in XXXX between February and March 2024. Data were collected using a Personal Information Form and a "Semi-Structured Interview Form" prepared for one-on-one interviews. Qualitative data were analyzed through conventional content analysis, with MAXQDA 2020 software used to facilitate data coding and theme development.

resultsThe participants' mean age was 52.3±8.75. Following the analysis, three themes, seven categories, and 98 codes were identified: "Perceptions," "Knowledge and Awareness," and "Participation Dynamics and Expectations for Support."

conclusionThe main reasons for women's nonparticipation in breast cancer screening were the absence of perceived discomfort and negligence, religious beliefs (prayer, destiny, breastfeeding), fear of unfavorable results, concerns about privacy, and lack of experience. In addition, practical issues, such as transportation difficulties and the cumbersome procedure of making appointments, also reduced participation. Insufficient knowledge, particularly a lack of accurate scientific information, prevents women from understanding the benefits of screening. Overcoming these barriers requires educational interventions, improved transportation options, and increased public trust in the healthcare system.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeMass ScreeningPatient Acceptance of Health CareAdultFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMiddle AgedQualitative Researchbreast cancerearly screeningqualitative researchscreening programs

Identifiers

PMID42405655
PMCPMC13535905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.