ReviewJournal of breast cancer2026
2025 Update of the Taiwan Expert Consensus on Hormone Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Management.
Review in Journal of breast cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
46 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer remains a major clinical burden and is characterized by sequential endocrine resistance over the disease course. In 2023, the Taiwan Breast Cancer Society (TBCS) published an expert consensus to support real-world decision-making in Taiwan. Subsequently, rapid advances in biomarker-informed strategies (e.g., estrogen receptor 1 and PI3K/AKT pathway alterations), endocrine partners, estrogen receptor (ER)-targeting agents (including oral selective ER degraders and emerging protein degraders), and the expanding role of antibody-drug conjugates based on human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 expression categories have materially increased the complexity of treatment selection and sequencing. Therefore, TBCS convened an expert panel to update the previous consensus while preserving its foundational framework and eight-chapter structure: risk evaluation and biomarker testing (I/II), first-line treatment selection (I/II), second-line treatment selection (I/II), and treatment options other than endocrine-based approaches (I/II). A multidisciplinary panel conducted a systematic literature review and iterative discussions using a modified Delphi process to identify the key clinical questions, update and refine statements where new evidence was practice-changing, and maintain continuity with the 2023 Consensus. The panel formulated updated recommendations, assigned levels of evidence and strengths of recommendations, and the key updates were integrated into practical treatment algorithms reflecting Taiwan's practice considerations. This updated consensus provides a continuity-based, yet evidence-responsive framework to facilitate the integration of emerging therapies into clinical practice in Taiwan and the Asia-Pacific region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.