ArticleVeterinary medicine and science2026
Detection of Felis catus Gammaherpesvirus 1 in Cats, but not Dogs, in Türkiye: Prevalence and Risk Factors.
Article in Veterinary medicine and science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe first gammaherpesvirus to be identified in cats, Felis catus gammaherpesvirus 1 (FcaGHV1), has been identified in different countries worldwide. However, there are limited studies on FcaGHV1 infection in Türkiye.
objectivesThe current study was carried out to determine prevalence of FcaGHV1 in Turkish domestic cats and dogs and to investigate potential risk factors that are associated with the detection of FcaGHV1.
methodsWhole blood samples were collected from cats (n = 54) and dogs (n = 44). The glycoprotein B (gB) gene-based TaqMan real-time PCR assay was utilised to determine the presence of FcaGHV1-specific DNA. Furthermore, the gB gene region of samples that were found positive in the TaqMan real-time PCR assay was amplified through conventional PCR.
resultsFcaGHV1-specific DNA was detected in 4 (7.4%, 95% confidence interval 0.4-14.4) of the 54 feline blood samples by TaqMan real-time PCR. However, FcaGHV1-specific DNA was not detected in the EDTA-blood samples from dogs. The field isolates in this study and isolates from domestic cats in Austria, Japan, Panama, Singapore, Switzerland, and the USA were clustered together by the phylogenetic analysis based on gB gene sequences. Analysis of risk factors showed that there was no significant association between the investigated variables (age, sex, breed, health status, neutering status and outdoor access) and FcaGHV1 detection.
conclusionsAccording to the current study, FcaGHV1 circulates in domestic cats in Türkiye. Furthermore, the results of this study suggest that virus transmission does not occur between cat and dog species. It is necessary to conduct more research to determine the prevalence of FcaGHV1 in Türkiye and to confirm the risk factors associated with FcaGHV1 detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.