Trial reportScandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports2026
Effects of Continuous and Cluster-Set Configurations Performed to Failure on Performance and Physiological Responses in the Bench Press and Half Squat.
Trial report in Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study compared the acute effects of continuous execution (CON) and two cluster-set configurations performed to momentary failure with high loads (~85% one-repetition maximum) on mechanical and physiological responses during the bench press and half squat. Twelve recreationally trained men completed three randomized, counterbalanced conditions: two using cluster sets of three repetitions with either 10 s (CS10) or 20 s (CS20) intra-set rest, and a control (CON) condition. In the bench press, CS10 did not significantly increase the number of repetitions compared with CON, while CS20 increased repetitions from 6.8 ± 1.6 to 11.4 ± 2.9 (p = 0.044). In the half-squat, the effect of cluster sets on repetitions was evident in both CS10 and CS20 compared with CON (18.3 ± 4.0 and 42.1 ± 7.7 vs. 10.6 ± 3.2 repetitions, respectively, p < 0.001). Set duration increased progressively with longer intra-set rest, particularly in the half squat, reaching in CS20, 90.7 ± 26.2 s and 344.6 ± 65.3 s (p < 0.001) in the bench press and half squat exercises, respectively. Mean heart rate (HR) in CS20 was higher in the half squat than the bench press (87.2% ± 4.9% vs. 70.4% ± 6.5% of max HR, p < 0.001), while blood lactate responses were also greater in half-squat compared with bench press (~8.5 vs. 5.5 mmol L
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.