Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42405482›Full record

ArticleSmall (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)2026

Decoupling Processing-Morphology-Stability Relationships Enables 19.65% Organic Solar Cells With Exceptional Photostability.

Zhipeng Yin, Zhisheng Zhou, Jialin Wu, Wei Meng, Zhe Liu, Lijun Chen, Kang An, Chao Li, He Yan, Yanming Sun and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Zhipeng YinInstitute of Polymer Optoelectronic Materials and Devices, Guangdong Basic Research Center of Excellence for Energy and Information Polymer Materials, National Key Laboratory of Luminescent Materials and Devices, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Zhisheng ZhouInstitute of Polymer Optoelectronic Materials and Devices, Guangdong Basic Research Center of Excellence for Energy and Information Polymer Materials, National Key Laboratory of Luminescent Materials and Devices, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Jialin WuInstitute of Polymer Optoelectronic Materials and Devices, Guangdong Basic Research Center of Excellence for Energy and Information Polymer Materials, National Key Laboratory of Luminescent Materials and Devices, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Wei MengInstitute of Polymer Optoelectronic Materials and Devices, Guangdong Basic Research Center of Excellence for Energy and Information Polymer Materials, National Key Laboratory of Luminescent Materials and Devices, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Zhe LiuInstitute of Polymer Optoelectronic Materials and Devices, Guangdong Basic Research Center of Excellence for Energy and Information Polymer Materials, National Key Laboratory of Luminescent Materials and Devices, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Lijun ChenZhejiang Engineering Research Center for Fabrication and Application of Advanced Photovoltaic Materials, School of Materials Science and Engineering, NingboTech University, Ningbo, China.
Kang AnInstitute of Polymer Optoelectronic Materials and Devices, Guangdong Basic Research Center of Excellence for Energy and Information Polymer Materials, National Key Laboratory of Luminescent Materials and Devices, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Chao LiGuangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Joint Laboratory of Optoelectronic and Magnetic Functional Materials, Hong Kong Branch of Chinese National, Engineering Research Center for Tissue Restoration and Reconstructions, Energy Institute, Department of Chemistry, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China.
He YanGuangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Joint Laboratory of Optoelectronic and Magnetic Functional Materials, Hong Kong Branch of Chinese National, Engineering Research Center for Tissue Restoration and Reconstructions, Energy Institute, Department of Chemistry, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1780-8308
Yanming SunSchool of Chemistry, Beihang University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7839-3199
Lei YingInstitute of Polymer Optoelectronic Materials and Devices, Guangdong Basic Research Center of Excellence for Energy and Information Polymer Materials, National Key Laboratory of Luminescent Materials and Devices, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1137-2355
Hai-Qiao WangZhejiang Engineering Research Center for Fabrication and Application of Advanced Photovoltaic Materials, School of Materials Science and Engineering, NingboTech University, Ningbo, China.
Ning LiInstitute of Polymer Optoelectronic Materials and Devices, Guangdong Basic Research Center of Excellence for Energy and Information Polymer Materials, National Key Laboratory of Luminescent Materials and Devices, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1208-4638

Funding

Ministry of Education of China JYB2025XDXM410National Key Research and Development Program of China 2022YFB4200400National Natural Science Foundation of China 52373179National Natural Science Foundation of China 52394273Ningbo Science and Technology Project 2022-DST-004TCL Science and Technology Innovation Fund 20242065
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The commercial viability of organic solar cells (OSCs) hinges critically on the simultaneous achievement of high efficiency and long-term operational stability. Yet, a quantitative mechanistic understanding of how multiple processing strategies collectively control film formation kinetics and device longevity remains scarce. In this work, a mechanism-guided multivariate framework is introduced to systematically deconvolve the individual and synergistic effects of solvent additives, solid additives, multi‑component blending, and thermal annealing. Using in situ time-resolved absorption spectroscopy, three distinct stages of film formation are identified, and the crystallization dynamics governed by different processing pathways are quantitatively resolved. A rationally designed synergistic combination of these strategies yields a highly ordered, thermodynamically robust bulk heterojunction (BHJ) morphology, enabling optimized OSCs that achieve a champion power conversion efficiency of 19.65% and outstanding stability under continuous 1‑sun-equivalent illumination (ISOS-L-1I). This work establishes a clear quantitative processing‑morphology‑stability correlation, providing a universal platform for the rational design of high‑performance, long‑lifetime OSCs.

Indexed as

morphology controloperational photostabilityorganic solar cellsprocessing‐morphology‐stability correlation

Identifiers

PMID42405482
PMCPMC13495856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.