ArticleNursing in critical care2026
Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Critical Care Nursing: A Discussion Paper.
Article in Nursing in critical care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly embedded in critical care environments to support clinical decision-making, risk prediction and workflow optimisation. However, many AI systems operate as opaque 'black boxes', raising ethical, professional and safety concerns in high-acuity settings where nurses remain accountable for patient outcomes. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) has emerged in response to these concerns by emphasising transparency, interpretability and human oversight.
aimTo critically discuss XAI and examine its relevance and implications for critical care nursing practice. STUDY
designDiscussion paper informed by literature on nursing ethics, professional accountability, critical care practice and healthcare AI.
resultsThis paper examines XAI as an approach to clinical AI that foregrounds transparency, interpretability, traceability and contestability. It argues that these features are especially important in critical care nursing, where nurses must assess, communicate, justify and, when necessary, challenge AI-informed recommendations in rapidly changing and high-stakes clinical situations. The paper discusses the relevance of XAI to clinical decision support, communication, handover and the exercise of clinical judgement and considers challenges related to cognitive workload, interpretive competence, workflow integration, governance and implementation. It further argues that the value of XAI in critical care depends not only on technical explainability but also on whether explanations are clinically meaningful and usable in bedside practice.
conclusionXAI should be understood not simply as a technical enhancement, but as a professional and ethical requirement for the responsible use of AI in critical care nursing. When implemented thoughtfully, XAI can strengthen clinical reasoning, transparency and accountable care. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Critical care nurses should be recognised essential stakeholders in the design, implementation, governance, education and policy development of clinical AI systems. Embedding explainability into AI is central to preserving nursing autonomy, professional accountability, patient safety and patient-centred care in technologically advanced critical care environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.