Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42405422›Full record

ArticleNursing in critical care2026

Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Critical Care Nursing: A Discussion Paper.

Daniel Joseph E Berdida

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing in critical care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Daniel Joseph E BerdidaNursing Department, North Private College of Nursing, Arar, Northern Border, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5001-6946

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly embedded in critical care environments to support clinical decision-making, risk prediction and workflow optimisation. However, many AI systems operate as opaque 'black boxes', raising ethical, professional and safety concerns in high-acuity settings where nurses remain accountable for patient outcomes. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) has emerged in response to these concerns by emphasising transparency, interpretability and human oversight.

aimTo critically discuss XAI and examine its relevance and implications for critical care nursing practice. STUDY

designDiscussion paper informed by literature on nursing ethics, professional accountability, critical care practice and healthcare AI.

resultsThis paper examines XAI as an approach to clinical AI that foregrounds transparency, interpretability, traceability and contestability. It argues that these features are especially important in critical care nursing, where nurses must assess, communicate, justify and, when necessary, challenge AI-informed recommendations in rapidly changing and high-stakes clinical situations. The paper discusses the relevance of XAI to clinical decision support, communication, handover and the exercise of clinical judgement and considers challenges related to cognitive workload, interpretive competence, workflow integration, governance and implementation. It further argues that the value of XAI in critical care depends not only on technical explainability but also on whether explanations are clinically meaningful and usable in bedside practice.

conclusionXAI should be understood not simply as a technical enhancement, but as a professional and ethical requirement for the responsible use of AI in critical care nursing. When implemented thoughtfully, XAI can strengthen clinical reasoning, transparency and accountable care. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Critical care nurses should be recognised essential stakeholders in the design, implementation, governance, education and policy development of clinical AI systems. Embedding explainability into AI is central to preserving nursing autonomy, professional accountability, patient safety and patient-centred care in technologically advanced critical care environments.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCritical Care NursingClinical Decision-MakingDecision Support Systems, ClinicalHumansartificial intelligenceclinical decision supportclinical judgementcritical care nursingexplainable artificial intelligencehuman oversightpatient safetyprofessional accountability

Identifiers

PMID42405422
PMCPMC13387823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.