ArticleFrontiers in physiology2026
The alveolar edema equation.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulmonary edema is excessive liquid accumulation in the alveolar air spaces and interstitium. This reduces gas exchange leading to increased morbidity and mortality. Clearance of pulmonary edema fluid relies on reabsorption into the alveolar interstitium and then either to the alveolar capillaries or to the lung lymphatics. How it reaches the lymphatics has been a puzzle since 1896. Our 2D model of an interstitial strip resolves that puzzle. We also show that alveolar interstitial pressures differ from values used in traditional medical textbooks. Our approach employs detailed fluid mechanical analysis of the alveolar capillary blood flow, interstitial fluid flow, and the alveolar liquid layer with gas interface and surface tension effects. The governing equations are coupled by Starling equations at both the capillary and alveolar membranes. Traditional approaches only consider the capillary Starling equation. Approximately 80% of the strip is 1D flow directly across the interstitium for either edema or clearance. There, we derive simple equations, usable by physiologists and clinicians, which predict the interstitial fluid pressure and the cross-flow rates (edema or alveolar-capillary clearance). Contrary to conventional tenets, the cross-flow rate magnitude is controlled by the alveolar membrane filtration coefficient, not the capillary membrane. Finally, we derive the critical capillary blood pressure leading to pulmonary edema, i.e., the alveolar edema equation. The latter matches well with clinical data on edema from high blood pressure or ARDS. It can be used to personalize PEEP therapy to prevent edema prophylactically or clear it.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.