ArticleFrontiers in oral health2026
Large language models as data-driven engines for benchmarking preventive and clinical knowledge in Chinese dental examinations.
Article in Frontiers in oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Digital and data-driven technologies are increasingly shaping preventive oral healthcare and dental education. While prior studies have explored large language model (LLM) performance in non-English examination settings, their role in benchmarking standardized clinical knowledge against real student performance under identical institutional conditions remains insufficiently examined. Methods: This study evaluated GPT-4o, GPT-4.5, and DeepSeek-R1 using 300 standardized dental competency items from institutional examinations (2023-2025). Model performance was benchmarked against data from a real student cohort who completed the same examinations, and intra-model consistency was assessed across multiple independent trials. Results: DeepSeek-R1 achieved the highest overall accuracy (92.33%), significantly outperforming GPT-4.5 and GPT-4o in 2023 and 2024, while showing comparable performance to GPT-4.5 in 2025. Model type was the predominant factor associated with accuracy differences, whereas knowledge domain did not significantly affect results. DeepSeek-R1 and GPT-4.5 also demonstrated greater response consistency than GPT-4o. Discussion: These findings suggest that optimized LLMs demonstrate strong alignment with standardized examination criteria and student performance patterns, supporting their potential role as supplementary tools for curriculum evaluation in preventive dental education. Caution is warranted in generalizing these results beyond the single-institutional, text-only, Mandarin-language context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.