ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology case reports2026
Unilateral corneal ectasia following trigeminal schwannoma resection with chronic neurogenic eye rubbing.
Article in American journal of ophthalmology case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Keratoconus (KC) is typically a bilateral, progressive corneal ectasia. Unilateral ectasia is uncommon and has been associated with chronic mechanical stress, such as eye rubbing. Although unilateral ectasia related to unilateral rubbing has been reported, the neurogenic driver of such behavior is less commonly highlighted. We describe a case of late-onset unilateral ectasia developing after trigeminal schwannoma resection. Case presentation: A 50-year-old man with a history of left cerebellopontine angle schwannoma resection developed persistent left-sided facial hypoesthesia followed by chronic unilateral eye rubbing. Approximately a decade later, he noticed progressive visual decline in the left eye (OS). Examination revealed advanced unilateral ectasia in OS, with high irregular astigmatism (4.8 D), and a corneal thinnest point of 439 μm, a Fleischer ring, and severely reduced corneal sensitivity on the Cochet-Bonnet aesthesiometer. The right eye (OD) remained unaffected, with normal corneal tomography and preserved corneal sensitivity. No family history or systemic risk factors for KC were identified, supporting a localized mechanical contribution. Conclusion: This case supports a plausible association between trigeminal nerve dysfunction, chronic unilateral eye rubbing, and subsequent corneal ectasia. It highlights the importance of recognizing neurogenic drivers of eye rubbing, performing careful ocular surface and corneal evaluation, and closely monitoring such patients for secondary corneal changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.