Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42405287›Full record

ArticlePatient preference and adherence2026

Examining Sex and Age Differences in Information Needs and Patient-Provider Communication Preferences for Genetic Counseling Among US Adults.

Leigh Anna Brown, Jordan Signorelli, Jennifer D Cotter, Anna Baker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Leigh Anna BrownDepartment of Psychology, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.
Jordan SignorelliDepartment of Psychology, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.
Jennifer D CotterDepartment of Psychology, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.
Anna BakerDepartment of Psychology, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Healthcare communication between patient and provider is important to enhance patient experience and ensure quality of care. Demographic differences, specifically sex and age, likely influence patient-provider interactions. The current study aims to examine how sex and age influence preferences for communication behaviors exhibited by their provider. Methods: Participants who were at least 18 years of age, U.S. residents, fluent in English, completed an online Qualtrics survey (N = 986, Results: Females (MANOVA: Conclusion: These findings highlight the importance of tailoring communication to socio-cultural factors including sex and age, which may enhance healthcare experiences.

Indexed as

age groupsgenetic counselinghealth communicationhealth personnelsex

Identifiers

PMID42405287
PMCPMC13332752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.