ArticleEJHaem2026
Identifying Educational and Resource Needs of General Internal Medicine Physicians in Sickle Cell Disease Management.
Article in EJHaem, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Sickle cell disease involves acute and chronic complications requiring timely recognition and multidisciplinary care. General internal medicine (GIM) physicians often manage affected adults with limited exposure and few supports. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional web-based survey of GIM physicians assessing comfort and preferred supports. Results: Eighteen of approximately 85 physicians responded (21%). Common encounters included chronic pain (83%), vaso-occlusive crises (67%), and acute chest syndrome (44%), yet none reported being comfortable managing complications. Discomfort was greatest for rare complications, and peripartum and perioperative care. Limited exposure was the main driver. Preferred supports included protocols, guides, and decision tools. Conclusion: Targeted tools and specialist support are urgently needed to improve care and physician comfort. Trial Registration: The authors have confirmed clinical trial registration is not needed for this submission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.