Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42405262›Full record

Trial reportPeerJ2026

The impact of virtual reality exercise programs on postpartum pelvic pain and disability among women with lumbopelvic pain.

Javeria Aslam, Alba Paris-Alemany, Raquel Díaz-Meco-Conde, Carlos Romero-Morales

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05921747 (The Impact of Innovative Technology Strategies on Implementing Exercise Programs Using Fully Immersive Virtual Reality for Postpartum Women), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05921747 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

The Impact of Innovative Technology Strategies on Implementing Exercise Programs Using Fully Immersive Virtual Reality for Postpartum Women

TypeinterventionalSponsorShalamar Institute of Health SciencesRan2023 to 2026Enrolled34ConditionsPost Partum Lumbopelvic PainArmsTraditional exercise as control group, VR Intervention Group Protocol
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Javeria AslamFaculty of Medicine, Health and Sports, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Villaviciosa de Odón, Madrid, Spain.
Alba Paris-AlemanyDepartment of Basic Health Sciences, Health Science Faculty, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Alcorcon, Madrid, Spain.
Raquel Díaz-Meco-CondeFaculty of Medicine, Health and Sports, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Villaviciosa de Odón, Madrid, Spain.
Carlos Romero-MoralesFaculty of Medicine, Health and Sports, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Villaviciosa de Odón, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Postpartum lumbopelvic pain (LPP) and pelvic floor dysfunction are highly prevalent conditions that contribute to persistent disability, pain, and impaired quality of life due to pelvic girdle pain. While conventional rehabilitation including traditional exercise (TE) methods such as pelvic floor muscle training and resistance exercises remains standard, they are often limited by poor adherence and reduced patient motivation. Virtual reality (VR) provides an innovative, non-invasive rehabilitation strategy, offering immersive and gamified environment that may improve patient engagement, neuromuscular control, and treatment outcomes. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of VR-based rehabilitation with TE therapy in reducing pain, disability, and pelvic floor dysfunction among postpartum women with LPP. Methods: A single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted, including 60 postpartum women aged 20-40 years experiencing LPP were enrolled between 2 and 12 weeks after delivery. No participants beyond this window were included. The assignment followed a simple randomization process and was done computational with equal distribution (1:1) of the VR and TE group. An independent researcher created 60 sequentially numbered, opaque and sealed envelopes. After participant enrollment, each envelope was opened to determine group assignment, ensuring equal group sizes. Both groups completed 8 sessions of pelvic floor muscle training over one month. The VR group additionally performed immersive tasks using Meta Quest 2 headsets and Lumbar Pain Rehab software. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, 4th week and 8th week assesment using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire (PGQ), McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) and Simulator Sickness (SSQ). Following approval from the Institutional Review Board of Shalamar Medical and Dental College (SMDC), which is a constituent body of Shalamar, with IRB no.0543 and reference no. SMDC-IRB/AI/18-1/2023. Results: Groups were comparable at baseline. At the 4th week assesment, the VR group showed significantly greater improvements in pain intensity (Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Conclusion: VR-based rehabilitation demonstrated greater short-term effectiveness than TE in reducing disability, alleviating pain related to pelvic girdle. Its immersive design promotes adherence and engagement, making it a clinically valuable intervention for postpartum recovery, particularly in resource-limited settings. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05921747.

Indexed as

Exercise TherapyLow Back PainPelvic PainVirtual RealityAdultDisability EvaluationFemaleHumansPain MeasurementPostpartum PeriodQuality of LifeSingle-Blind MethodTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultDisabilityFully immersive exercise environmentLumbopelvic painPain managementPelvic floor dysfunctionPelvic painPostpartum rehabilitationTraditional exercisesVirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID42405262
PMCPMC13332716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.