Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42405255›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2026

Darío San Segundo Molina, A Marcia Barbosa, Antonio J Pérez-Luque, Francisco Rodríguez Sánchez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Darío San Segundo MolinaDepartamento de Ciencias de la Vida, Universidad de Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.
A Marcia BarbosaSpatial Biology Lab (SBL), Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Antonio J Pérez-LuqueDepartment of Ecology, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain.
Francisco Rodríguez SánchezDepartamento de Biología Vegetal y Ecología, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Under ongoing global warming and recent crop pest invasions, there is an urgent need to fill the gap between experimental research on pest thermal biology and applied forecasting tools that inform pest-management policies. The R package mappestRisk provides an accessible, open-source workflow that enables researchers, particularly those working in experimental pest biology, to forecast pest risk based on collected data on the thermal response of pest development rates. Built upon recent advances in open-source software development in the R environment, mappestRisk offers an accessible pipeline that spans from fitting performance curves for development rates data to generating broad-scale pest risk maps. Starting with user-provided temperature-dependent life-history dataset, the package fits nonlinear regression models and visualizes their thermal performance curves, with Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) scores and bootstrapped uncertainty ribbons. This allows users to select the most appropriate model based on biological, ecological and statistical criteria. The package then calculates thermal boundaries around the optimal region of the selected curve. These boundaries are used to extract climatic data for a user-defined spatial region or country and to map the number of months per year with optimal temperatures for pest development. The output consists of static or interactive raster maps that provide valuable insights for pest risk based on the known thermal biology of the target pest. This workflow contributes to making pest forecasts open, reproducible and accessible to the scientific community, while also providing relevant information for policy-making institutions and plant-protection organizations involved in crop-pest management.

Indexed as

Crops, AgriculturalPest ControlSoftwareAnimalsRisk AssessmentTemperatureBiological invasionsDevelopment rateForecastsFundamental thermal nicheIntegrated pest managementPest risk assessmentThermal performance curves

Identifiers

PMID42405255
PMCPMC13333130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.