ArticlePeerJ2026
A retrospective study of differential prognostic factors in early-onset
Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer (EO-CRC; age <50 years) has been increasing worldwide. This single-center retrospective study aimed to compare the clinical characteristics of EO-CRC and late-onset CRC (LO-CRC; age ≥ 50 years) and to identify age-specific prognostic factors for overall survival (OS). Methods: A total of 1,148 CRC patients were retrospectively analyzed and categorized into EO-CRC ( Results: EO-CRC patients showed higher proportions of family history, concurrent polyps, and Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression >10%, whereas LO-CRC patients exhibited higher rates of hypertension, diabetes, and elevated carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels. Although OS did not differ significantly between groups ( Conclusion: This study suggests that EO-CRC and LO-CRC have fundamentally different prognostic determinants: the former emphasizes genetic susceptibility and tumor invasiveness, indicating that this group of patients may benefit from early genetic counseling, MMR/MSI testing, and immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. The latter highlights age, acquired molecular changes, and chronic systemic factors, supporting the inclusion of metabolic and geriatric assessments in routine tumor care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.