Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42405222›Full record

ArticleIranian endodontic journal2026

Nonsurgical Endodontic Management of Type II Dens Invaginatus Associated with Gemination in a Maxillary Lateral Incisor: A CBCT-Assisted Case Report.

Maryam Dalaei Moghadam

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Iranian endodontic journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Maryam Dalaei MoghadamDepartment of Endodontics, Razi Herbal Medicines Research Center, Faculty of Dentistry, Lorestan University of Medical Science, Khorramabad, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dens invaginatus (DI) is a developmental dental anomaly characterized by the invagination of the enamel organ into the dental papilla during tooth development, often resulting in complex root canal anatomy and increased susceptibility to pulpal disease. Gemination is another uncommon developmental anomaly resulting from the incomplete division of a single tooth germ, which produces an enlarged or bifid crown. The simultaneous occurrence of these anomalies in a single tooth is extremely rare. This case report describes the diagnosis and nonsurgical endodontic management of a maxillary lateral incisor presenting with both gemination and Oehlers type II dens invaginatus. A 14-year-old female patient was referred for further endodontic management of the maxillary left lateral incisor. Normal apical tissues were diagnosed, and the referring practitioner previously initiated endodontic therapy. Clinical examination revealed a bifid crown morphology, while cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) demonstrated type II dens invaginatus associated with gemination and a complex root canal system with apical bifurcation. Root canal treatment was performed under dental operating microscope magnification using nickel-titanium rotary instrumentation, passive ultrasonic irrigation, and calcium hydroxide intracanal medication. The root canal system was subsequently obturated using gutta-percha and AH-Plus sealer by the cold lateral compaction technique. At the 12-month follow-up, the tooth remained asymptomatic and exhibited normal clinical and radiographic findings. This case highlights the importance of CBCT and magnification-assisted endodontic treatment in the successful management of rare developmental anomalies with complex internal anatomy.

Indexed as

Cone-beam Computed TomographyDens invaginatusEndodontic TreatmentGeminationMaxillary Lateral Incisor

Identifiers

PMID42405222
PMCPMC13332817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.