ArticleIranian endodontic journal2026
Design, Metallurgical Features, and Mechanical Behavior of Five Reciprocating NiTi Endodontic Systems: A Multimethod Analysis.
Article in Iranian endodontic journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This work aimed to examine the geometrical, metallurgical, and static mechanical properties of five reciprocating NiTi endodontic files with similar cross-sectional geometries. Materials and Methods: Reciproc Blue, ProDesign R, V File, V+ File, and Univy One systems were evaluated using a multimethod approach including geometrical analysis, scanning electron microscopy, energy-dispersive spectroscopy, differential scanning calorimetry, X-ray diffraction, bending resistance, and torsional tests. Results: R-phase was predominant in most instruments, while the Univy One system showed indications of a combined martensitic and R-phase structure. ProDesign R demonstrated superior flexibility, whereas Reciproc Blue and V File exhibited greater torsional resistance. Cross-sectional area was an important factor influencing the mechanical characteristics of the instruments, although metallurgical aspects appeared to influence the behavior of specific systems. Conclusion: Geometry and metallurgical characteristics influenced the observed static mechanical behavior of the evaluated reciprocating instruments. Instruments exhibiting higher proportions of martensite and R-phase demonstrated enhanced flexibility, while bending resistance was also strongly affected by cross-sectional geometry, highlighting the combined influence of material properties and design on mechanical performance. However, the findings should be interpreted within the limitations of static mechanical evaluation, since cyclic fatigue testing was not performed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.