ArticleIDCases2026
When MRI and CSF are inconclusive: A case report of neurobrucellosis presenting with dysarthria in an adolescent.
Article in IDCases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Neurobrucellosis is a serious complication of brucellosis, a common zoonotic infection. Its clinical diagnosis is often challenging due to the wide spectrum of clinical manifestations and the limited sensitivity of conventional diagnostic tools, including neuroimaging and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis, which may be normal or non-diagnostic. Case presentation: A 17-year-old male was recently diagnosed with brucellosis and was on standard triple antibiotic therapy. He presented with worsening systemic symptoms and new dysarthria. Contrast-enhanced brain magnetic resonance imaging was normal despite clear neurologic involvement. Lumbar puncture showed a mildly abnormal CSF with 10 white blood cells/mm3, normal protein and glucose levels. Blood and CSF cultures were negative, but Brucella serology was strongly positive. CSF Brucella PCR returned positive, confirming central nervous system involvement. Management and outcome: Due to the high clinical suspicion of neurobrucellosis in the setting of non-diagnostic routine investigations, therapy was escalated to intravenous ceftriaxone for improved central nervous system penetration, in addition to doxycycline and rifampicin. The patient showed rapid and marked clinical improvement following appropriate CNS-targeted therapy, with resolution of dysarthria and systemic symptoms, and was discharged to complete a prolonged antibiotic course. Conclusion: This case highlights the diagnostic challenge of neurobrucellosis when conventional investigations such as MRI and CSF analysis are non-specific or minimally abnormal. Clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion in endemic areas, as early diagnosis often relies on clinical judgment supported by serology and molecular testing. Recognition of the limitations of routine investigations is essential to avoid delayed treatment and prevent neurological complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.