ReviewRSC advances2026
Next-generation biodiesel production: catalytic innovations and scalable microalgal biorefinery systems.
Review in RSC advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The transition toward low-carbon liquid fuels is increasingly urgent due to fossil fuel depletion, carbon budget overshoot, and the escalating environmental and public health impacts associated with combustion-based energy systems. Biodiesel has emerged as a strategically important renewable fuel owing to its compatibility with existing diesel infrastructure and its potential to deliver meaningful life-cycle greenhouse gas reductions. This review provides a comprehensive and critical assessment of next-generation biodiesel production, integrating catalytic science, feedstock development, process engineering, sustainability metrics, and industrial implementation perspectives within a unified framework. Fundamental aspects of biodiesel chemistry, fuel properties, and quality standards are first outlined to establish a rigorous basis for subsequent analysis. The evolution of biodiesel feedstocks from first-generation edible oils to second-generation waste-derived lipids and third-generation microalgae is critically examined, highlighting sustainability trade-offs, resource constraints, and scalability considerations associated with each feedstock class. Particular attention is devoted to microalgal biorefinery systems, which offer exceptional lipid productivity, non-arable land utilization, carbon dioxide capture potential, and opportunities for resource recovery, while simultaneously facing significant cultivation, harvesting, and downstream processing challenges. The review further provides a mechanistic and comparative evaluation of homogeneous, heterogeneous, bifunctional, and enzymatic catalytic systems, together with quantitative assessment of catalytic performance, feedstock tolerance, operational stability, and industrial applicability. Recent advances in process-intensification technologies, including supercritical processing, continuous-flow reactors, reactive distillation, and non-thermal enhancement techniques, are critically evaluated in the context of biodiesel commercialization. Furthermore, techno-economic analysis (TEA), life-cycle assessment (LCA), technology-readiness considerations, and industrial scalability challenges are integrated to identify key bottlenecks and future development priorities. By integrating catalytic innovation, feedstock evolution, process-intensification technologies, sustainability assessment, and commercialization perspectives, this review provides a distinctive roadmap for translating laboratory-scale advances into commercially competitive, low-carbon biodiesel technologies capable of supporting future energy-transition objectives.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.