Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42405129›Full record

ArticleRSC advances2026

Development of a green design reverse phase liquid chromatography method for determining the ionization profile of parabens.

İlkay Konçe, Ebru Çubuk Demiralay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RSC advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

İlkay KonçeSuleyman Demirel University, Institute of Health Sciences, Department of Pharmaceutical Research and Development Isparta 32260 Turkey ebrucubuk@sdu.edu.tr.
Ebru Çubuk DemiralaySuleyman Demirel University, Institute of Health Sciences, Department of Pharmaceutical Research and Development Isparta 32260 Turkey ebrucubuk@sdu.edu.tr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6270-7509

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The most popular method for determining chromatographic separation selectivity is an optimization method based on the use of different solvents. This article presents a sustainable chromatographic framework using reverse phase liquid chromatography (RPLC) to determine the ionization behavior of methylparaben, ethylparaben, propylparaben, and butylparaben, which are widely used in hydroorganic mixtures. In this study, retention-mobile phase pH data in methanol-water (40-55% v/v) and ethanol-water (30-45% v/v) mixtures were analyzed using a nonlinear regression (NLREG) approach to calculate the dissociation constant values of the compounds. Simultaneously, solvent strength selectivity was determined by varying the percentage of organic solvent in the mobile phase. Experimental studies were performed at 37 °C using a Gemini NX column (250 × 4.60 mm I.D., 3.5 µm). The solvatochromic solvent polarity parameter (

Identifiers

PMID42405129
PMCPMC13329777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.