ReviewRSC advances2026
A review of immobilized molecular transition metal catalysts for ethylene oligomerization and polymerization reactions.
Review in RSC advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transformations of olefins into valuable feedstocks and their end products are among the most versatile chemical processes in modern science and technology. Among these reactions, olefin oligomerization and polymerization are instrumental in producing a wide range of products, including fuels, plasticizers, lubricants, surfactants, detergents, co-monomers, and plastics. Over the past century, homogeneous late-transition-metal catalysts have successfully facilitated olefin oligomerization reactions, but not without major drawbacks, such as a lack of catalyst recyclability and reusability. On the other hand, while heterogeneous catalysts are recyclable, they suffer from poor selectivity, thus limiting their application in the production of fine and specialty chemicals. This has necessitated the evolution of a third generation of catalysts in the form of supported single-site ("hybrid") catalysts that bridge both the advantages of homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysts of high selectivity and recovery, respectively. Therefore, in this review, we present the use of inorganic, organic, and polymer supports to immobilize molecular catalysts reported to date in the literature. The review covers the immobilization strategies, types of inorganic and polymer supports, and the application of these supported catalysts in ethylene oligomerization and polymerization reactions. It further presents a comparative analysis of the different classes of supports, a critical evaluation of the immobilization strategies, and their influence on the performance of the resultant immobilized catalysts. The major findings and critical analyses of the literature data, together with future perspectives, are also summarized.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.