Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42405085›Full record

ReviewRSC advances2026

Review of conventional and emerging recycling methods for carbon fiber-reinforced thermoset polymer composites: challenges and future perspectives.

Reza Eslami-Farsani, Saba Noorsina, Amir Hossein Sadeghi, Abbas Tcharkhtchi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RSC advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Reza Eslami-FarsaniFaculty of Materials Science and Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology Tehran Iran eslami@kntu.ac.ir.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7838-6199
Saba NoorsinaFaculty of Materials Science and Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology Tehran Iran eslami@kntu.ac.ir.
Amir Hossein SadeghiFaculty of Materials Science and Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology Tehran Iran eslami@kntu.ac.ir.
Abbas TcharkhtchiArts et Metiers Institute of Technology, CNAM, PIMM Paris 75013 France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) composites play critical roles in advanced industries due to their high strength-to-weight ratio and durability; however, CFRP waste management and recycling have become an environmental and economic necessity. Landfilling these composites, after their service life, wastes valuable resources of reinforcing fibers (such as carbon fibers) and may release toxic byproducts. Despite significant advances in this field, recycling CFRP composites remains a challenge. Thus, it is crucial to develop efficient, clean, and cost-effective methods for recycling CFRP, especially to preserve the value of both the fibers and thermoset polymer matrix components. This review study covers current CFRP recycling technologies, including the chemical, thermal, and mechanical recovery of CFRP composites across various matrix types (such as epoxy and phenolic, and other thermoset matrices). Also, recent developments have introduced advanced techniques such as carbonization, solvothermal, electrochemical, sonochemical, and biological recycling. These methods aim to improve fiber recovery while reducing energy consumption and preserving material quality. Future advancements are expected to focus on hybrid and multifunctional recycling systems integrated within circular economy frameworks, enabling closed-loop processes and reducing reliance on virgin resources. Such innovations will transform CFRP composites from waste into valuable sustainable resources.

Identifiers

PMID42405085
PMCPMC13330985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.