ArticleJournal of medical education and curricular development
"Internet+" Case-Based Learning Improves Perceived Learning Gains and Teaching Satisfaction in an Integrated Medical Curriculum: A Comparative Study.
Article in Journal of medical education and curricular development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The integration of "Internet+" technologies into medical education has prompted the evolution of traditional teaching models. Case-based learning (CBL), a student-centered approach, is widely used in integrated curricula such as Clinical Pathophysiology & Therapeutics (CPPT). However, the comparative effectiveness of "Internet+" CBL versus traditional CBL in this context remains underexplored. Objective: To compare the effects of "Internet+" CBL and traditional CBL on teaching satisfaction and perceived learning gains among medical students in a CPPT course, and to provide evidence for educational reform. Methods: A within-subject comparative survey was conducted among fourth-year undergraduate medical students who had experienced both CBL modalities. The adapted Students' Evaluations of Educational Quality (SEEQ) questionnaire was used to assess teaching satisfaction and perceived learning gains. Data from 180 valid responses were analyzed using paired t test or Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test. Results: "Internet+" CBL was rated significantly higher than traditional CBL in overall teaching satisfaction, understanding and application of knowledge, and development of information analysis and teamwork skills. However, the results showed that the "Internet+" CBL modality received higher ratings in terms of learning burden. Both modalities faced challenges in pre-class question initiation and teacher-student interaction. Conclusion: "Internet+" CBL is associated with higher student-reported learning gains and greater teaching satisfaction among the medical students, albeit with an increased workload. The findings support the adoption of blended CBL approaches in integrated medical curricula and highlight areas for further optimization, such as improving pre-class engagement and interaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.