Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42405009›Full record

ArticleForensic science international. Synergy2026

Explainable deep learning in bloodstain pattern analysis: A pilot study using convolutional neural networks with saliency maps.

Vasiliki Pasalidi Chantzi, Jo Millington, Enrico Mariconti, Sherry Nakhaeizadeh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Forensic science international. Synergy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vasiliki Pasalidi ChantziDepartment of Security and Crime Science, University College London, 35 Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9EZ, UK, United Kingdom.
Jo MillingtonDepartment of Security and Crime Science, University College London, 35 Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9EZ, UK, United Kingdom.
Enrico MaricontiDepartment of Security and Crime Science, University College London, 35 Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9EZ, UK, United Kingdom.
Sherry NakhaeizadehDepartment of Security and Crime Science, University College London, 35 Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9EZ, UK, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this pilot study was to explore the feasibility of applying a novel explainable deep learning (XDL) methodology to classify Bloodstain Pattern Analysis (BPA) patterns. A convolutional neural network (CNN) was applied to classify impact and non-impact BPA patterns. A combination of BPA patterns generated by the researcher were supplemented by open-source BPA datasets and used for the CNN training. This methodology yielded promising results of up to 79% accuracy over 10 folds, validating the feasibility of such research avenues in the field. Furthermore, saliency maps were applied as the CNN's explainability layer, which is a novel application of XDL in BPA interpretations. The study highlights the potential of a novel BPA research stream in XAI while also underscoring the potential of the model to act as a possible reliable alternative tool for BPA experts over manual classification methodologies. This approach does not aim to replace the human element from the forensic science process but rather provide a tool to BPA experts to aid and expedite BPA interpretations without compromising on explainability metrics. It has the potential to increase transparency and trust in deep learning systems, which in turn would increase the reliability of forensic outcomes.

Indexed as

Artificial neural networksBloodstain pattern analysisConvolutional neural networksExplainable deep learningForensic interpretationsSaliency mapsWhite-box BPA XAI methodology

Identifiers

PMID42405009
PMCPMC13329560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.