Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42404961›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in public health2026

Dissemination and implementation science for global ophthalmology: closing the last-mile translational gap.

Ana Bastos de Carvalho, S Lee Ware, Christina R Studts, Wanjiku Mathenge

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ana Bastos de CarvalhoDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, United States.
S Lee WareDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, United States.
Christina R StudtsAdult & Child Center for Health Outcomes Research & Delivery Science (ACCORDS), University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States.
Wanjiku MathengeRwanda International Institute of Ophthalmology School of Ophthalmology, Kigali, Rwanda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite remarkable advances in ophthalmic diagnostics and therapeutics over the past decade, the global prevalence of avoidable visual impairment and blindness has remained unchanged. This paradox reflects a crisis of care delivery and the persistent failure to consistently, equitably, and effectively translate evidence-based interventions into routine practice for the millions who need them most. Dissemination and implementation (D&I) science offers ophthalmology rigorous, evidence-informed frameworks to close this last-mile translational gap. Drawing on the established body of D&I science theory, methods, and applications, this review argues that ophthalmology has been slow to harness these tools, and that doing so now is imperative. We examine the current evidence for D&I science applications across key domains of global eye care: equitable care delivery in the US, global eye health in low- and middle-SDI regions, gender equity, and the implementation of artificial intelligence-based diagnostic tools. Across each domain, we identify both promising examples of D&I science in action and critical gaps in evidence, equity, and sustainability. Achieving vision health equity worldwide will require ophthalmology to treat the dissemination, implementation, and sustainment of evidence-based eye care as central to its mission as the development of the innovations themselves.

Indexed as

Global HealthImplementation ScienceInformation DisseminationOphthalmologyTranslational Science, BiomedicalBlindnessHumansartificial intelligenceblindnessgender equityglobal healthhealth disparate minority and vulnerable populationsimplementation sciencelow visionophthalmology

Identifiers

PMID42404961
PMCPMC13328180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.