ArticleInternational journal of public health2026
Tool for identifying occupational exposures and risks in agriculture (TIERRA): application in coffee farming in Uganda.
Article in International journal of public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study developed a practical, context-sensitive assessment tool to prioritize occupational risks in agriculture (TIERRA). We applied TIERRA in a case study with smallholder coffee farmers in Uganda (FarmCoUganda) to demonstrate its effectiveness. Methods: TIERRA follows a stepwise, participatory process beginning with an inventory of 80 occupational hazards, reviewed by local experts for clarity and prioritized by community stakeholders through a Delphi workshop. Participants rate the likelihood, severity, and risk of hazards. In the Ugandan case study, 31 stakeholders rated 59 hazards relevant to smallholder coffee farmers in Mbale District. Results: Stakeholders prioritized 23 hazards across six categories: biological, chemical, ergonomic, and physical hazards, each comprising three items, plus five environmental and six psychosocial hazards. "Contact with a pesticide" received the highest overall risk score. "Mosquito bites" emerged as the most significant biological risk. Ergonomic hazards received the highest categorical risk rating. Conclusion: TIERRA fosters stakeholder ownership and facilitates dialogue toward action. It supports the development of tailored farmer surveys, training and safer working conditions. It offers a methodological blueprint for adaptation across diverse agricultural contexts, including in LMICs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.